Insurance Services of Beaufort Incorporated v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company Insurance Services of Beaufort Incorporated’s Empirical Analysis
966 F.2d 847 · 1992
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Roy W. Krieger v. Kathlynn G. Fadely,appellees (2000), GNB Battery Technologies, Inc. v. Gould, Inc. (1995)
12 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Costello v. United States · Ryland v. Shapiro · United States v. Prudential Insurance Company · Skogen v. The Dow Chemical Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[f]urther necessary or proper relief based on a declaratory judgment or decree ... against any adverse party whose rights have been determined by such judgment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“ha[d] been demanded, or even proved, in the original action for declaratory relief.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“An action under the Declaratory Judgment Act is regarded as an 'ordinary civil action’ subject to all of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It goes almost without saying that in an ordinary civil action, a court is not entitled to rule on contested damages from briefs without a hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.