Fancil v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[a]lthough the State did present evidence that [the defendant] had been manufacturing meth for a number of months and possessed a degree of skill, [the officer's] testimony did not address a specific conversion ratio for [the defendant] in light of his capability and the materials present at his residence.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Mealor

2. “[t]he State contend[ed] that [the defendant] only had to achieve a conversion ratio of twenty percent, not the fifty percent considered in Halferty , 930 N.E.2d at 1154 , in order to produce three grams of meth from fifteen grams of pseudophedrine.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Mealor

3. “Moreover, although [the defendant] only needed to be able to convert at a rate of twenty percent to produce the three grams, the State cannot rely on the low conversion ratio from Halferty that was not in evidence in this case.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Mealor