Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 966 P.2d 1046 - Jackson v. State

Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2019

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

60199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Chaloux v. Killeen · People v. Elliott · In Re Interrogatories Relating to the Great Outdoors Colorado Trust Fund · Bolt v. ARAPAHOE CTY. SCHOOL DIST. SIX

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When Sheriff Jackson was elected in 1994, the constitution only required that a county sheriff be a qualified elector and a resident of the county for the one-year period preceding his election. [Citation.] [¶] ... [T]hese constitutional qualifications were exclusive, and the General Assembly had no authority to impose additional qualifications as a prerequisite to holding the office of county sheriff. [Citation.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The Colorado Constitution reserves no authority in the state legislature to change, add to, or diminish the qualifications for constitutionally created offices.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.