Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 966 P.2d 808 - Durham v. Wal-Mart

Durham v. Wal-Mart’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 1999
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Parks v. Norman Municipal Hospital · Bittman v. Boardman Co. · Jones v. Johnston County Election Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... the Bittman Court went on to further explain a court is not obligated to accept testimony as true merely because there is no direct testimony contradicting it, " where it contains inherent probabilities or contradictions which alone, or in connection with other circumstances in evidence, justify an inference that the evidence is false." (Emphasis in original).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.