Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 966 P2D 995 - Eppenger v. State

Eppenger v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2005
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co. · State v. Andrews · Muller v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. · Neitzel v. State · Manes v. Coats

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it does not seem reasonable that the legislature intended to treat this conduct as a felony when it provided, in a related statute, that unreasonable retention of a car under a written agreement would be punishable as a misdemeanor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] person commits the crime of vehicle theft in the first degree if, having no right to do so or any reasonable ground to believe the person has such a right, the person drives, tows away, or takes (1) the car ... of another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “even if the defendant originally obtained the vehicle with permission. 7”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.