Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

966 So. 2d 1020

Riffe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 19, 2007

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2007-10-19

Relies on Stewart v. State

Decided 2007-10-19

LAWSON, J.

¶1Steven Riffe appeals from an order denying his rule 3.800(a) motion seeking additional jail credit. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a). The State concedes that because the trial court failed to attach portions of the record to support denial of Riffe’s motion, we must reverse. See, e.g., Stewart v. State, 920 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (noting that when the trial court denies a 3.800 motion as successive, it “is required to attach the relevant portions of the record which demonstrate that the motion is successive.”).

¶2REVERSED AND REMANDED.

THOMPSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.
/966/so2d/1020 · .json · Public domain