Darling v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
50
cited by 50 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 49 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Ring v. Arizona · Caldwell v. Mississippi · Michel v. State of Louisiana Poret
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[T]his Court has held that "even if alternate witnesses could provide more detailed testimony, trial counsel is not ineffective for failing to present cumulative evidence.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The defendant carries the burden to overcome the presumption of effective assistance....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.