Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

966 So. 2d 816

State v. Perez

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 2007

Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 2007-10-03

Relies on 966 So. 2d 813 - State v. Perez

Decided 2007-10-03

SULLIVAN, Judge.

¶1For the reasons assigned in State v. Perez, 07-229 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/3/07), 966 So.2d 813, 2007 WL 2850578, this matter is remanded to the trial court for another evidentiary hearing to determine whether the State’s agreement to Defendant’s plea was invalidated by vacation of the restitution to victims whose cases were dismissed. If the trial court imposes restitution as a condition of probation, it is instructed not to order restitution to a victim’s insurer and to establish a determinate, specified payment plan for all fees and restitution amounts.

¶2REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

/966/so2d/816 · .json · Public domain