Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

966 So. 2d 820

Docket No. 07-238.

State v. Perez

STATE of Louisiana v. Fay PEREZ, III.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 2007.

Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 2007-10-03

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2015

5 state decisions

Relies on 966 So. 2d 813 - State v. Perez

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-10-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Michael Harson, District Attorney, Ted L. Ayo, Assistant District Attorney, Abbeville, LA, for State of Louisiana.

¶2Mark O. Foster, Louisiana Appellate Project, Natchitoches, LA, for Defendant/Appellant, Fay V. Perez, III.

¶3Court composed of ULYSSES GENE THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge, MARC T. AMY, and MICHAEL G. SULLIVAN, Judges.

¶4SULLIVAN, Judge.

¶5For the reasons assigned in State v. Perez,07-229 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/3/07), 966 So.2d 813, 2007 WL 2850578, this matter is remanded to the trial court for another evidentiary hearing to determine whether the State's agreement to Defendant's plea was invalidated by vacation of the restitution to victims whose cases were dismissed. If the trial court imposes restitution as a condition of probation, it is instructed not to order restitution to a victim's insurer and to establish a determinate, specified payment plan for all fees and restitution amounts.

¶6REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

/966/so2d/820 · .json · Public domain