Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 966 So. 2d 98 - State v. Chambers

966 So. 2d 98 - State v. Chambers’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · 443 So. 2d 522 - State v. Sweeney · 847 So. 2d 1198 - State v. Love · 376 So. 2d 136 - State v. Reaves

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... [T]he proper approach to the question of whether the defendant’s right to a speedy trial was violated is not merely a review of the dates and circumstances of the hearings, but an examination of the entire record in order to discern whether there was “palpable abuse” on the part of the trial court in granting the motion to quash.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.