Grabill Corporation Ncnb National Bank of North Carolina’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably In the Matter of John A. Maurice, Debtor-Appellant (1994), Stansbury Poplar Place Incorporated (1993)
3 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Crowell v. Benson · Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg · Curtis v. Loether · Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether bankruptcy courts possess the statutory ... authority to conduct jury trials”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] personal injury or wrongful death tort claim against a bankruptcy estate can be tried in a Federal district court with a jury,” and noting that the district court in which the bankruptcy case was pending would decide the venue for such a trial. Id. at 20226. (4) Rep. Kastenmeier emphasized that the conferees had rejected a Senate proposal that bankruptcy judges not be allowed to “hear unliquidated claims,” id. at 20227, and then explained the exception to bankruptcy court jurisdiction for personal injury claims as defining where the claim would be tried or”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. In Re UAL Corp.“Of course a requirement that the parties consent, which we find in the Magistrates Act, makes a difference. But I do not suppose that Congress would allow Federal Cases to be tried before panels of astrologers, necromancers, clairvoyants, or judges of cat shows or (other) beauty contests provided that only litigants consented. Congress must have thought that Magistrate Judges were competent to conduct jury trials and if they are, so must Bankruptcy Judges be.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.