Mannes v. Gillespie’s Empirical Analysis
967 F.2d 1310 · 1992
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably 22 Cal. 4th 260 - People v. Hatch (2000), James v. Borg (1994)
26 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Younger v. Harris · Burks v. United States · Tibbs v. Florida · Abney v. United States · United States v. Scott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because full vindication of the right necessarily requires intervention before trial, federal courts will entertain pretrial habeas petitions that raise a colorable claim of double jeopardy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Deedy v. Suzuki“[t]he Fifth Amendment's protection against double jeopardy ... is not against being twice punished, but against being twice put in jeopardy,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Page v. King“'whether the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a prosecution is not determined by the characterization of a dismissal under state law.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Drake v. Thomas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.