United States v. Ramirez-Jiminez’s Empirical Analysis
967 F.2d 1321 · 1992
Citation profile
116 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 199 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably United States v. Soto (1993), United States v. Arambula-Ruiz (1993)
116 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (§ 274 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Huddleston v. United States · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · United States v. Martinez-Fuerte · United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal · United Mine Workers, Local No. 1854 v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 199 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the prior act need not be similar to the charged act as long as the prior act was one which would tend to make the existence of the defendant's knowledge more probable than it would be without the evidence.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'an emotional response in the jury or otherwise tends to affect adversely on the jury's attitude toward the defendant wholly apart from its judgment as to his guilt or innocence of the crime charged.'”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“we will uphold admission of the evidence when it is clear from the record that the court implicitly made the necessary finding.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.