Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 967 F.2d 176 - Walker v. Butler

Walker v. Butler’s Empirical Analysis

967 F.2d 176 · 1992

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2016

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

60199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Thompkins v. Belt · Johnson v. Treen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “McMurtry argues that his conduct did not amount to deliberate indifference because he did not know that Walker had broken his ankle and because he actually escorted Walker to the hospital.... A prison guard is deliberately indifferent if he intentionally denies or delays access to medical care.... Walker was not denied medical treatment and there is no proof that medical treatment was delayed as a result of McMurtry’s decision to make Walker walk to the hospital. Walker argues that McMurtry exhibited deliberate indifference by forcing him to walk to the hospital, rather than calling the medical personnel to the cafeteria. Deliberate indifference is a legal conclusion which must rest on facts evincing wanton actions on the part of the defendant.... Wantonly means having a reckless disregard for the rights of others.... We hold that the district court erred in concluding that McMurtiy acted with deliberate indifference. His decision to make Walker walk to the hospital to be treated was not wanton and did not involve a reckless disregard of Walker’s rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.