United States v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
967 F.2d 20 · 1992
Citation profile
129 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 160 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably United States v. Morrison (1998), United States v. Reese (1993)
129 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. United States · United States v. Kim · United States v. Rodriguez · United States v. Cervantes · United States v. Aymelek
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 160 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining whether the extent of the departure is reasonable, the court should look “to the amount and extent of the departure in light of the grounds for departing” and “examine the factors to be considered in imposing a sentence under the Guidelines, as well as the district court’s stated reasons for the imposition of the particular sentence.” The key question is whether the “reasons given by the district court ... are sufficient to justify the magnitude of the departure.””
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]t may be appropriate to count a single factor both in assessing the defendant's criminal history category and in calculating the applicable offense level since the two measure different things. The offense level represents a judgment as to the wrongfulness of the particular act. The criminal history category principally estimates the likelihood of recidivism.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“where a single act is relevant to two dimensions of the Guideline analysis”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.