United States v. Checchini’s Empirical Analysis
967 F.2d 348 · 1992
Citation profile
30 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Fraley v. United States Bureau of Prisons (1993), United States v. Huss (1993)
30 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3585 · 22 U.S.C. § 2778
Relies on United States v. Wilson · United States v. Martinez · Home Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. Gillam · United States v. Lancellotti
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“commence serving his sentence and exhaust his administrative remedies before he can petition for judicial review of the Attorney General's denial (if any) of credit for time served.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A defendant shall be given credit toward the service of a term of imprisonment for any time he has spent in official detention prior to the date the sentence commences ... as a result of the offense for which the sentence was imposed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Sec. 3585(b) does not authorize a district court to compute the credit at sentencing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.