Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 967 F.2d 462 - Hancock v. Hobbs

Hancock v. Hobbs’s Empirical Analysis

967 F.2d 462 · 1992

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
1
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably Reese v. Herbert (2008), Sprague v. Thorn Americas, Inc. (1997)

15 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions

2801992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Batson v. Kentucky · Graham v. Connor · Powers v. Ohio · Whalen v. Roe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The common law — as interpreted by United States courts in the light of reason and experience — governs a claim of privilege unless any of the following provides otherwise: • the United States Constitution; • a federal statute; or • rules prescribed by the Supreme Court. But in a civil case, state law governs privilege regarding a claim or defense for which state law supplies the rule of decision.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a continuing duty to make a seasonable supplementation to its original answers to any question asking for the identity of an expert witness expected to be called at trial, the subject matter on which the expert will testify and the substance of his testimony.” Hancock v. Hobbs, 967 F.2d 462 , 468 (11th Cir.1992). The defendants indicate that Reese”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Federal common law does not recognize a psychiatrist-patient privilege”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.