Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 967 F.2d 648 - Colorado Springs Production Credit Association v. Farm Credit Administration Production Credit Association of Southeast Missouri v. Farm Credit Administration Chattanooga Production Credit Association v. Farm Credit Administration

Colorado Springs Production Credit Association v. Farm Credit Administration Production Credit Association of Southeast Missouri v. Farm Credit Administration Chattanooga Production Credit Association v. Farm Credit Administration’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2012

2 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

80199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · Village of Euclid Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co · Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon · Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co. · Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether there were other subgroups who could or should have borne a greater share of the burden as a policy matter; the judiciary is not institutionally fitted to undertake such an inquiry.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “vindicat[ed] the market's perception that the United States implicitly stood behind the Farm Credit System”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Although the Supreme Court has suggested that doing business in a regulated field might reduce an enterprise's reasonable expectation of noninterference, ... we are unsure how much weight to put upon governmental supervision and regulation in takings analysis. In this era of pervasive regulation, this factor might prove far too much: almost any entity could be said to have a reasonable expectation of governmental intrusion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.