967 F. Supp. 2d 326 - Koch v. Schapiro’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
6 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 633A (§ 15 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 794A · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Conley v. Gibson · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Haines v. Kerner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“analysis is equally applicable to allegations of improper handling of a complaint by the EEO office of a federal agency, which provides a function analogous to the EEOC.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Congress intended the private right of action provided for in section 706(f)(1) of the Act ( 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) )-under which an aggrieved employee may bring a Title VII action directly against his or her employer-to serve as the remedy for any improper handling of a discrimination charge by the EEOC.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Coulibaly v. Pompeo“Congress has not authorized, either expressly or impliedly, a cause of action against the EEOC for the EEOC's alleged negligence or other malfeasance in processing an employment discrimination charge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.