Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 967 P.2d 192 - People v. Holmes

People v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Larry Little · Eaton v. City of Tulsa · Hodges v. Gray · Conway v. Conway · People v. Ellis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Such power is not designed to protect a judge's own dignity, but rather to protect the rights of litigants and the public. It should be invoked only when the judicial process has been seriously affronted or disrupted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[clontempt that the court has seen or heard and is so extreme that no warning is necessary or that has been repeated despite the court's warning to desist”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.