Sharma v. Vigil’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 2020
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Canton Oil Corp. v. District Court In & For Second Judicial District · Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. Cache Creek Mining Trust · Williams v. Hankins · Dunton v. Whitewater West Recreation, Ltd. · Front Range Partners v. Hyland Hills Metropolitan Park & Recreation District
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the burden of establishing the grounds for relief under C.R.C.P. 60(b) by clear, strong, and satisfactory proof,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.