Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 967 P.2d 960 - State v. Vessey

State v. Vessey’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
5
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2014

23 state decisions

120199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 2 Cal. 3d 118 - People v. Marsden · McKee v. Harris · United States v. Padilla · United States v. Goldberg · United States v. Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Finally, without a per se rule no incentive exists for a trial court to conduct the appropriate review in a timely manner. We therefore remand this case to the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine if defendant’s complaints about his appointed counsel justified the appointment of substitute counsel. If so, the trial court should grant defendant a new trial. However, if the court deter mines defendant’s request for substitution of counsel was unfounded, the judgment of conviction would stand as entered.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'[a juvenile] court's failure to investigate a ... timely substitution request [made by an indigent party with appointed counsel]”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`failure to investigate a ... timely substitution request [made by an indigent parent with appointed counsel] is per se error.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.