967 So. 2d 131 - Willacy v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Illinois v. Gates · Glasser v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Strategic choices made after thorough investigation of law and facts relevant to plausible options are virtually unchallengeable; and strategic choices made after less than complete investigation are reasonable precisely to the extent that reasonable professional judgments support the limitations on investigation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Under Strickland, ‘counsel has a duty to make reasonable investigations or to make a reasonable decision that makes particular investigations unnecessary.’” Marshall v. State, 854 So.2d 1235, 1247 (Fla.2003) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 691, 104 S.Ct. 2052 ); see also Carroll v. State, 815 So.2d 601, 614-615 (Fla.2002) (same).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Butler v. State“would have opened the door to aggravating facts,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.