Neumont v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Save Our Dunes v. Alabama Department of Environmental Management · Neumont v. Monroe County · 664 F. Supp. 488 - ABT Corp., Inc. v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, FLA. · Webb v. Town Council of Town of Hilliard · Neumont v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether, for purposes of Florida Statutes section 125.66(4)(b), a “substantial or material change” in a proposed ordinance during the enactment process (that is, the kind of change that would require a county to start the process over) is confined to a change in the “original general purpose” of the proposed ordinance, or whether a substantial or material change includes (1) a change to the “actual list of permitted, conditional, or prohibited uses within a zoning category,” or (2) a change necessary to secure legislative passage of the ordinance?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Neumont v. Florida
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.