Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 967 SW2D 47 - State v. Chaney

State v. Chaney’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

226
cited by 226 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 222 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 226 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2019 · most notably Holmes v. South Carolina (2006), Moss v. State (2000)

2 federal appellate · 222 state decisions

1140199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Burks v. United States · Benton v. Maryland · Morgan v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 226 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]his inquiry does not require a court to ask itself whether it believes that the evidence at trial established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Instead, the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Because the equally valid inferences rule is at war with the due process standard governing an appellate court’s review of the sufficiency of evidence, the equally valid inferences rule should no longer be applied. Rather, the standard to be applied is the due process standard ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the Court accepts as true all of the evidence favorable to the state including all favorable inferences drawn from the evidence and disregards all evidence and inferences to the contrary.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.