Norman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
October 2016
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Chapman v. State of California · Kyles v. Whitley · Seward v. State · Atkinson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“apprehending criminals who are involved in drugs” from "a drug dealer who was familiar with cocaine because he bought and sold the drug.” Id. at 31 . That rationale is consistent with the Advisory Committee Notes to Federal Rule of Evidence 701, which explain that if the witness such a police officer was to testify about “how a narcotic was manufactured”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Campbell v. State“police officers must be qualified as experts before identifying a controlled substance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Campbell v. State“apprehending criminals who are involved in drugs” from”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Campbell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.