Hazard v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Heath v. Vose · Young v. State · State v. Hazard · State v. Thomas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“this Court will review de novo any post-conviction relief decision involving questions of fact or mixed questions of law and fact pertaining to an alleged violation of an applicant's constitutional rights.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“available to a convicted defendant who contends that his original conviction or sentence violated rights afforded to him under the state or federal constitution.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“this Court will refrain from disturbing a trial justice's factual findings absent a showing that the trial justice overlooked or misconceived material evidence or otherwise was clearly wrong.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.