United States v. Barbee’s Empirical Analysis
968 F.2d 1026 · 1992
Citation profile
81 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 119 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably United States v. Jones (1995), United States v. Hardwell (1996)
81 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Arizona v. Fulminante · United States v. Sokolow · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · United States v. Ross
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 119 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o party may assign as error any portion of the charge or omission therefrom unless that party objects thereto before the jury retires to consider its verdict, stating distinctly the matter to which that party objects and the grounds of the objection.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[S]uch behavior [passengers sinking down below seat level] is suspicious conduct not clearly susceptible to unsuspicious interpretations, unlike passengers merely avoiding eye contact....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Error may not be predicated upon a ruling which admits ... evidence unless a substantial right of the party is affected and ... a timely objection ... appears of record, stating the specific ground of the objection, if the specific ground was not apparent from the context.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.