Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 968 F.2d 1159 - United States v. Adeleke

United States v. Adeleke’s Empirical Analysis

968 F.2d 1159 · 1992

Citation profile

99
cited by 99 later decisions
April 2021
most recently cited

42 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 99 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably United States v. Reese (1993), United States v. Camacho-Ibarquen (2005)

42 federal appellate ·

4501992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (§ 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Mathews v. Diaz · United States v. Campbell · United States v. Goolsby · United States v. Worthy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Double counting a factor during sentencing is permissible if the Sentencing Commission intended the result, and if the result is permissible because 'each section concerns conceptually separate notions related to sentencing.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]n adjustment under subsection (b)(1) or (b)(2) for a prior felony conviction applies in addition to any criminal history points added for such conviction in Chapter Four, Part A (Criminal History).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “for a felony or aggravated felony. U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b). Application Note 6 states that “Deported after a conviction ... means that the deportation was subsequent to the conviction, whether or not the deportation was in response to such conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.