United States v. McGlory’s Empirical Analysis
968 F.2d 309 · 1992
Citation profile
81 federal appellate · 29 district · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 233 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Dia v. Ashcroft (2003), United States v. Perez (2002)
81 federal appellate · 29 district · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Jackson v. Virginia · Terry v. Ohio · Chapman v. State of California · Glasser v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 233 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]here need be only a prima facie showing, to the court, of authenticity, not a full argument on admissibility. Once a prima facie case is made, the evidence goes to the jury and it is the jury who will ultimately determine the authenticity of the evidence, not the court. The only requirement is that there has been substantial evidence from which they could infer that the document was authentic.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The contents of the statement shall be considered but are not alone sufficient to establish ... the existence of the conspiracy and the participation therein of the declarant and the party against whom the statement is offered....”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.