Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 968 F.2d 401 - 1975 Salaried Retirement Plan for Eligible Employees of Crucible, Inc. v. Nobers

1975 Salaried Retirement Plan for Eligible Employees of Crucible, Inc. v. Nobers’s Empirical Analysis

968 F.2d 401 · 1992

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
2
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably In Re: Prudential Insurance Company of America Sales Practice Litigation Marvin Lowe and Alice Lowe (2001), Plumb v. Fluid Pump Service, Inc. (1997)

17 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions

3101992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Younger v. Harris · Pilot Life Insurance v. Dedeaux · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Taylor · Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendon · Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. Coyne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] court of the United States may not grant an injunction to stay proceedings in a State court except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments.” 28 U.S.C. § 2283 . These exceptions do not apply here, Only the”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he provisions of this subchapter and sub-chapter III of this chapter shall supersede any and all Stale laws insofar as they may now or hereafter relate to any employee benefit plan described in section 1003(a) of this title and not exempt under section 1003(b) of this title....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “expressly authorized by an Act of Congress, or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.