Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 968 F.2d 433 - United States v. Greer

United States v. Greer’s Empirical Analysis

968 F.2d 433 · 1992

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
4
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably State v. Aikins (1997), United States v. Neal (1994)

33 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

3401992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Swain v. State of Alabama · Hernandez v. New York · Smith v. Phillips · Murphy v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “involves the narrow question of whether, in a capital case, jurors must be asked whether they would automatically impose the death penalty upon conviction of the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “we do not reach the issue of the applicability of Batson and Edmonson [v. Leesville Concrete Co., Inc., 500 U.S. 614 , 111 S.Ct. 2077, 114 L.Ed.2d 660 (1991)] " to religion) (Smith, J.), ("[W]e note that information as to whether members of the venire were Jewish was essential for the defendants to make reasonably intelligent use of their peremptory challenges.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.