Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 968 F.2d 66 - Apache Powder Company v. United States K US

Apache Powder Company v. United States K US’s Empirical Analysis

968 F.2d 66 · 1992

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
July 2022
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2022

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

701992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Greater Boston Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., a Massachusettscorporation, Intervenor. Whdh, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Greater Boston Televisioncorporation, a Massachusetts Corporation, Intervenor. Charles River Civic Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., Boston Broadcastersinc., Intervenors. Whdh, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Boston Broadcasters, Inc., Intervenor. Greater Boston Tv Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., Boston Broadcastersinc., Intervenors · Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency · Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency · Kent County, Delaware Levy Court v. United States Environmental Protection Agency · Anne Arundel County v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “policy question [ ] appropriate for agency resolution,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.