Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 968 F.2d 795 - United States v. Speach

United States v. Speach’s Empirical Analysis

968 F.2d 795 · 1992

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
September 2007
most recently cited

18 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 6928 · 7 U.S.C. § 2024

Relies on American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Liparota v. United States · United States v. Freed · Gregory v. United States · Dade County v. Lake Lucerne Civic Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any person who ... knowingly transports or causes to be transported any hazardous waste identified or listed under this subchapter to a facility which does not have a permit under this subchapter....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “knowingly uses, transfers, acquires, alters, or possesses [food stamp] coupons or authorization cards in any manner not authorized by [the statute] or regulations”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “knowingly transport[ ] ... hazardous waste ... to a facility which does not have a permit,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.