Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 968 F.2d 810 - McGonigle v. Combs

McGonigle v. Combs’s Empirical Analysis

968 F.2d 810 · 1992

Citation profile

192
cited by 192 later decisions
6
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

111 federal appellate · 8 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 192 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably 5 Cal. 4th 1082 - Mirkin v. Wasserman (1993), Miller v. Pezzani (1994)

111 federal appellate · 8 district · 9 state decisions

1360199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc. · Herman & MacLean v. Huddleston · Palmer v. Hoffman · Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 192 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] directed verdict is proper when the evidence permits only one reasonable conclusion as to the verdict.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We have acknowledged a limited exception to our strict interpretation of Rule 51, however. Where the district court is aware of a party's concerns with an instruction, and further objection would be unavailing, we will not require a futile formal objection.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “No party may assign as error the giving or the failure to give an instruction unless that party objects thereto before the jury retires to consider its verdict, stating distinctly the matter objected to and the grounds of the objection.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.