United States v. Doe’s Empirical Analysis
968 F.2d 86 · 1992
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. Mayor of Baltimore (2013), Iskcon of Potomac, Inc. v. Kennedy (1995)
14 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Ward v. Rock Against Racism · Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization · Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent · Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]y no reasonable measure does Lafayette Park display the characteristics of a setting in which the government may lay claim to a legitimate interest in maintaining tranquility.” Id. at 89 . However, the District of Columbia Circuit found that the government does have an interest in maintaining some order in parks, even urban parks across the street from the White House.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In a First Amendment challenge, the government bears the burden of showing that its restriction of speech is justified under the traditional `narrowly tailored' test.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[E]ven in a public forum the government may impose reasonable restrictions on the time, place, or manner of protected speech, provided the restrictions “are justified without reference to the content of the regulated speech, that they are narrowly tailored to serve a significant governmental interest, and that they leave open ample alternative channels for communication of the information.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.