Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

968 So. 2d 626

Docket No. 2D06-1194.

Lauderdale v. State

Carl Wayne LAUDERDALE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 24, 2007.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2007-10-24

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2011

1 state decisions

Relies on Owens v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-10-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Dan Hallenberg, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

¶2Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Carl Wayne Lauderdale, Jr., appeals his judgments and sentences for two counts of sexual battery. He was convicted of sexually battering his wife at knifepoint. We affirm the convictions without further discussion. Although we also affirm the two concurrent life sentences imposed for these crimes, we must vacate amendments made by the trial court at a time when it lacked jurisdiction to make these particular changes.

¶5After the notice of appeal was filed and while this appeal was pending, the trial *627 court amended the sentencing documents by adding a dangerous sexual felony offender designation. It also added to the sentences a twenty-five-year mandatory minimum term that was discussed at the sentencing hearing but was not actually orally announced by the trial court. Lauderdale argues, and the State concedes, that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to make these amendments. See Shepherd v. State,912 So.2d 1250, 1252 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (vacating sexual predator designation imposed, in lieu of sexual offender designation originally imposed, after defendant filed notice of appeal). Accordingly, we vacate these amendments and remand for the entry of corrected sentences. Our ruling is without prejudice for the State to seek reimposition of the dangerous sexual felony offender designation and mandatory minimum sentences, but we express no opinion at this time as to whether the trial court will have the authority to reimpose the designation and mandatory minimum sentences.

¶6Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded.

¶7ALTENBERND, SALCINES, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

/968/so2d/626 · .json · Public domain