Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 968 So. 2d 853 - State v. Braziel

968 So. 2d 853 - State v. Braziel’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Boykin v. Alabama · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · 661 So. 2d 442 - State v. Smith · Suwannee Swifty Stores, Inc. v. Georgia Lottery Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. When a criminal statute requires that all or a portion of a sentence imposed for a violation of that statute be served without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence, each sentence which is imposed under the provisions of that statute shall be deemed to contain the provisions relating to the service of that sentence without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence. The failure of a sentencing court to specifically state that all or a portion of the sentence is to be served without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence shall not in any way affect the statutory requirement that all or a portion of the sentence be served without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence. [[Image here]] C. The provisions of this Section shall apply to each provision of law which requires all or a portion of a criminal sentence to be served without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence, or of any one of them, any combination thereof, or any substantially similar provision or combination of substantially similar provisions. [[Image here]]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] trial court lacks the authority to grant or deny good time. Except where otherwise provided by law, the provisions of LSA-R.S. 15:571.3(C) are directed to the Department of Corrections exclusively, and 'the sentencing judge has no ... role in the matter of good time credit.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.