Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 968 SW2D 141 - State v. Flenoy

State v. Flenoy’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 2019

1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

130199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Missouri v. Hunter · United States v. Dixon · Albernaz v. United States · United States v. Bennett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if two offenses are the same under the [Blockburger ] test for purposes of barring consecutive sentences at a single trial, they necessarily will be the same for purposes of barring successive prosecutions,” and citing Dixon to deduce the converse proposition that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.