¶2Plaintiff landowner appeals the judgment of trial court in defendants’ favor in an unlawful detainer case. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
¶3An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been fiimished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
¶4The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).