968 SW2D 367 - Ex Parte Silva

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2010

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1 *368 OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Appellant was indicted for indecency with a child and two counts of aggravated sexual assault. Upon Appellant’s plea of guilty, the trial court deferred adjudication of guilt and placed Appellant on community supervision for ten years. Appellant did not appeal from the deferred adjudication order. While on community supervision, Appellant filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in the trial court, claiming his guilty plea was involuntary. The trial court granted the writ, but denied relief. See Ex parte Hargett, 819 S.W.2d 866 (Tex.Cr.App.1991). Appellant appealed the denial of habeas relief, and the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal. Ex parte Silva, 963 S.W.2d 945 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1998).

¶3 The Court of Appeals held that without a final conviction, the order denying habeas relief was an interlocutory order over which it had no jurisdiction. Op. at p. 946. In Ex parte McCullough, 966 S.W.2d 529 (Tex.Cr.App.1998), we relied on Hargett and held that courts of appeals have jurisdiction to review the denial of habeas relief from a claim of illegal restraint by an order deferring adjudication of guilt. 1 Therefore, the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to hear the appeal in the instant case.

¶4 Accordingly, we grant Appellant’s petition, vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand the cause for that court to address Appellant’s points of error. .

¶5 . At the time the Court of Appeals handed down its opinion, it did not have the benefit of our decision in McCullough.