State v. Brainard’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rodriguez v. New York · Gulbenkian v. Penn · Davis v. Huey · Lowe v. Texas Tech University · State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the witness is not testifying as an expert, the witness’ testimony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to those opinions or inferences which are (a) rationally based on the perception of the witness, and (b) helpful to a clear understanding of the witness’ testimony or the determination of a fact in issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A]ny final judgment adjudicating the title dispute in a suit brought concerning title to boundaries of the Canadian River under this resolution shall be limited to settling the title dispute and may not authorize an award of monetary damages or attorney’s fees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brainard v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.