Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 968 S.W.2d 774 - Laseter v. Griffin

Laseter v. Griffin’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 2002
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Zueck v. Oppenheimer Gateway Properties, Inc. · 23 Cal. App. 2d 680 - Miles v. A. Arena & Co. · S.A. Gerrard Co., Inc. v. Fricker · Faire v. Burke · Pendergrass v. Lovelace

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, (2) Lack of jurisdiction over the person, (3) That plaintiff does not have legal capacity to sue, (4) Insufficiency of process, (5) Insufficiency of service of process, (6) Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, (7) Failure to join a party under Rule 52.04, (8) That plaintiff should furnish security for costs, (9) That there is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause in this state, (10) That several claims have been improperly united, (11) That the counterclaim or cross-claim is one which cannot be properly interposed in this action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.