Edison Electric Institute v. Interstate Commerce Commission’s Empirical Analysis
969 F.2d 1221 · 1992
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2019
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2344 · 49 U.S.C. § 11162
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Permian Basin Area Rate Cases · Investment Co. Institute v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System · Nader v. Federal Communications Commission · Functional Music, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n adding a productivity adjustment to the Yoyo rule, the ICC did not apply the Yoyo rule to any particular carrier nor extend it to any new circumstance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“suggests that a party may challenge an agency's statutory authority whenever the agency applies a rule against it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“on the ground that it exceeds the agency's statutory authority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.