Haitian Centers Council, Inc. v. McNary’s Empirical Analysis
969 F.2d 1326 · 1992
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently December 2019 · most notably Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. McNeil-P.P.C., Inc. (1992), Able v. United States (1995)
18 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Malloy v. Hogan · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Stevic · Houltin v. United States · Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. Mezei
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he Republic of Cuba consents that during the period of the occupation by the United States of [Guantanamo Bay] . . . the United States shall exercise complete jurisdiction and control over and within said areas . . . .”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gherebi v. Bush · Gherebi v. Bush“It does not appear to us to be incongruous or overreaching to conclude that the United States Constitution limits the conduct of United States personnel with respect to officially authorized interactions with aliens brought to and detained by such personnel on a land mass exclusively controlled by the United States ... given the undisputed applicability of federal criminal laws to incidents that occur there and the apparent familiarity of the governmental personnel at the base with the guarantees of due process, fundamental fairness and humane treatment which this country purports to afford to all persons.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Gherebi v. Bush · Gherebi v. Bush““(1) irreparable harm should the injunction not be granted, and (2) either (a) a likelihood of success on the merits, or (b) sufficiently serious questions going to the merits and a balance of hardships tipping decidedly toward the party seeking injunc-tive relief.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.