Boggan v. Data Systems Network Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
969 F.2d 149 · 1992
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably Keller v. United States (1995), Union Pacific Resources Group, Inc. v. Rhône-Poulenc, Inc. (2001)
16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. Shipman · Rosenberg v. Comerica Bank · Joseph v. United States · Trenholm v. Ratcliff · Johnson v. Peckham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well settled that the negotiations and discussions leading up to the writing cannot displace the terms of the written agreement.”). We decline to do so. Our decision in Boggan was in part based on the finding that the alleged misrepresentations were expressions of intent, rather than statements of fact, see id., and that statements such as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) a material representation was made; (2) it was false when made; (3) the speaker knew it was false, or made it recklessly without knowledge of its truth and as a positive assertion; (4) the speaker made it with the intent that it should be acted upon; and (5) the party acted in reliance and .suffered injury as a result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“every form of relation between parties wherein confidence is reposed by one in another, and he relies and acts upon the representations of the other and is guilty of no derelictions on his own part”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.