Tucker v. Day’s Empirical Analysis
969 F.2d 155 · 1992
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Frazer v. United States (1994), Scarpa v. Dubois (1994)
22 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Cronic · Brewster v. Derwinski · Avery v. State of Alabama · Burch v. State of Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]lthough counsel is present, the performance of counsel may be so inadequate that, in effect, no assistance of counsel is provided.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he effectiveness of representation at the first sentencing hearing . . . does not fulfill the Constitutional requirement that [defendant] be assisted by counsel at his resentencing hearing,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Daniels v. State“'[A]ctual or constructive denial of the assistance of counsel is legally presumed to result in prejudice.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.