Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 969 F.2d 211 - Guzowski

Guzowski’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
March 2009
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Hishon v. King & Spalding · United States v. Grinnell Corp. · Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. · Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is perfectly plain that an internal “agreement” to implement a single, unitary firm’s policies does not raise the antitrust dangers that § 1 [of the Sherman Antitrust Act] was designed to police. The officers of a single firm are not separate economic actors pursuing separate economic interests, so agreements among them do not suddenly bring together economic power that was previously pursuing divergent goals.... For these reasons, officers or employees of the same firm do not provide the plurality of actors imperative for a § 1 conspiracy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.