Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 969 F.2d 368 - Cooper v. Lane

Cooper v. Lane’s Empirical Analysis

969 F.2d 368 · 1992

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Gustovich v. AT & T Communications, Inc. (1992), 35 Cal. App. 4th 733 - Villa v. McFerren (1995)

30 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

350199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Wolff v. McDonnell · Ponte v. Real · Paulussen v. Herion · Egger v. Phillips

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We have long refused to consider arguments that were not presented to the district court in response to summary judgment motions.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “summary judgment must be entered 'against a party who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.