Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 969 F.2d 425 - United States v. Doherty

United States v. Doherty’s Empirical Analysis

969 F.2d 425 · 1992

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
March 2020
most recently cited

49 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2020 · most notably 134 S. Ct. 2384 - Loughrin v. United States (2014), United States v. LeDonne (1994)

49 federal appellate · 1 district ·

5201992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Cannon v. University of Chicago · Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc. · Hughey v. United States · Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis v. Carver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Check kiting, at root, is a plan designed to separate the bank from its money by tricking it into inflating bank balances and honoring checks drawn against accounts with insufficient funds.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “repeated acts over a period of time, unless it is clear that each instance was purely opportune.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[d]rafting 40 overdraft checks during a single month, few if any of which appear to be purely opportune, arguably fits [the more than minimal planning] profile.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.